Top 10 Multi-Cloud Management Platforms for 2025

Multi-cloud was supposed to save money and give businesses freedom. Instead, a 2024 survey of 753 organizations found that 89% said they use more than one cloud for storage and workloads, but most are getting burned. Many organizations report they're not saving money like they expected. Cloud bills are spiraling out of control, with some companies experiencing significant unexpected cost increases.

But some companies are winning big. They're achieving substantial cost savings, deploying faster, and staying online while competitors crash. What's their secret? They picked the right management platform.

This guide reviews the 10 best multi-cloud management tools for 2025. You'll learn multi-cloud pricing, what problems they solve, and which one fits your business size and needs.

What is Multi-Cloud Management?

Multi-cloud management means controlling all your cloud services from one place instead of jumping between different vendor dashboards. Right now, if you use AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, you need three different logins, three different interfaces, and three different ways to track spending.

Here's the problem: More than a quarter of respondents (29%) spend over $12 million a year on cloud services, but most can't tell you where that money goes. Multi-cloud management platforms fix this by giving you one dashboard that shows everything.

These platforms do more than just monitoring. They can automatically provision resources, enforce security policies, track costs, and move workloads around. Think of it like having one remote control that works with all your different cloud providers.

Why Multi-Cloud Management Matters

Companies choose multi-cloud for good reasons. They want to avoid getting locked into one vendor, use the best services from each provider, and keep running if one cloud goes down. But without proper management, these benefits turn into nightmares.

You Can't See What's Happening

Each cloud has its own monitoring tools. Want to know your total storage costs across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud? You'll be switching between three dashboards that show data differently. Multi-cloud platforms solve this by showing everything in one place.

Security Gets Messy

AWS has one way of handling security, Azure has another, and Google Cloud does it differently. What's secure in one cloud might leave you wide open in another. Management platforms let you set security rules once and apply them everywhere.

Costs Spiral Out of Control

Cloud pricing is already confusing. Multiply that across three or four providers, and you're asking for trouble. Hidden fees, data transfer charges, and forgotten resources can turn a $5,000 budget into a $50,000 shock. Good platforms catch this stuff before it hits your credit card.

Your Team Can't Keep Up

Finding people who really understand AWS is hard. Finding someone who knows AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Kubernetes? Good luck. Management platforms hide the differences between clouds so your team can focus on building products instead of learning vendor quirks.

Everything's Different

Each cloud handles networking, storage, and servers differently. Building an app that works across multiple clouds means becoming an expert in each one. Management platforms give you standard ways to deploy that work everywhere.

Compliance Becomes Impossible

Keeping up with security policies, access controls, and compliance rules gets exponentially harder with each cloud you add. Centralized management means you set rules once instead of configuring them separately in each environment.

Key Benefits of Multi-Cloud Management

Companies that get multi-cloud management right see big improvements in costs, speed, and reliability.

Real Cost Savings

Well-managed multi-cloud setups typically cut infrastructure costs by 30-50%. This happens because platforms automatically resize resources, put workloads in the cheapest locations, and kill unused stuff. Some companies save even more when platforms move workloads around automatically based on pricing.

No More Bill Surprises

Good platforms predict what you'll spend and alert you when something weird happens. No more getting blindsided by bills that are 10x what you expected.

Everything Runs Better

Automated systems watch your resources and fix problems. Idle servers are shut down, oversized instances are rightsized, and workloads are automatically moved to better infrastructure.

Deploy Faster

Standard templates and deployment pipelines mean teams can spin up production environments in minutes instead of weeks. The same process works whether you're using AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.

Work from One Place

No more switching between vendor dashboards. Your team uses one interface with consistent workflows across all your clouds.

See Everything

One dashboard shows app performance, infrastructure health, security status, and costs. You can trace problems from slow app response all the way back to specific servers across different clouds.

Set Rules Once

Security policies, access controls, and compliance monitoring work from one place. Instead of configuring security separately in each cloud, you define it once, and it applies everywhere.

Same Process Everywhere

Deployments, backups, and disaster recovery work the same way regardless of which cloud is running underneath. This cuts errors and makes training simpler.

Scale Smart

Multi-cloud platforms excel at spreading workloads for the best performance and cost. They can automatically scale apps across regions and providers based on demand, speed requirements, and cost.

Best Multi-Cloud Management Platforms for Your Business Needs

1. Nomadesk

Nomadesk originated as a means of storing files securely. We have since turned it into a complete file management system with support for multiple cloud platforms. Organizations that have to deal with data across multiple cloud providers without compromising on privacy will find this solution most convenient.

What makes it good:

• Syncs files across AWS S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage, and other providers

• Military-grade encryption that keeps your data secure across all connected clouds

• Easy interface that non-technical teams can use, but it still has powerful automation

• Hosted in Europe for GDPR compliance and data sovereignty

• Zero-knowledge encryption, where even Nomadesk can't see your data

Multi-cloud support: Works with all major cloud storage providers, plus APIs for custom setups. Really strong for companies that need secure file management across different cloud environments.

Best for: Small to medium businesses that prioritize data security and privacy, professional services, healthcare companies, and anyone who needs GDPR-compliant multi-cloud file management.

Pricing: Simple pricing at €14 per user monthly with no hidden fees. Extra storage costs €8 per TB monthly. No surprise egress charges.

Good stuff:

• Improved security and privacy controls over most enterprise platforms

• Simple setup with no technical know-how required

• Excellent file versioning and audit trail

• Transparent pricing without any surprise charges

• Robust European data protection

Downsides:

• Limited infrastructure management compared to enterprise platforms

• Focused on file and data management, not computing resources

• Smaller partner ecosystem than major cloud providers

2. VMware vRealize Cloud Management

VMware's enterprise platform handles lifecycle management for multi-cloud environments. Works especially well if you already use VMware infrastructure.

What makes it good:

• Deep connections with VMware vSphere environments

• Advanced automation for provisioning, scaling, and shutting down resources

• Detailed cost management with chargeback and showback reports

• Strong governance and compliance features

Multi-cloud support: Works with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and VMware Cloud services. Best for hybrid setups that combine on-premises VMware with public clouds.

Best for: Large companies with existing VMware infrastructure, organizations with strict governance requirements, and companies with complex hybrid cloud needs.

Pricing: Enterprise licensing that varies based on infrastructure size. Usually requires a big upfront investment.

Good stuff:

• Mature platform that scales for large enterprises

• Great hybrid cloud capabilities

• Strong automation features

Works well with VMware products

Downsides:

• Too complicated for most teams

• Costs a lot upfront

• Way too much for small businesses

• Ties you to VMware's products

3. HashiCorp Terraform Cloud (IBM)

IBM bought HashiCorp for $6.4 billion in 2025, so Terraform Cloud is now part of IBM's cloud strategy. You write configuration files that tell it what infrastructure you want, and it builds everything for you across different clouds.

What makes it good:

• Connects to over 200 different services

• Tracks change to your infrastructure, like code

• Allows you to set rules that everyone has to follow

• Teams can work together on infrastructure projects

Multi-cloud support: Unmatched provider support including all major clouds, SaaS services, and on-premises infrastructure. One workflow manages resources anywhere.

Best for: DevOps teams, companies that want infrastructure-as-code, and organizations that need reproducible infrastructure across environments.

Pricing: Recently switched to Resource Under Management pricing. Standard tier costs $0.00014 per hour per managed resource after 500 free resources. Enterprise starts at $15,000 yearly.

Good stuff:

• Most comprehensive provider ecosystem

• Great infrastructure-as-code capabilities

• Strong community

• Powerful collaboration features

Downsides:

• New pricing model can be unpredictable and expensive

• Needs significant infrastructure-as-code expertise

• Complex state management for large environments

• Recent licensing changes created uncertainty

4. IBM Cloud Pak for Multicloud Management

Hybrid cloud management and app modernization are the main objectives of IBM's enterprise platform. Based on Red Hat OpenShift and equipped with extensive tools for cloud-based infrastructure and application management.

What makes it good:

• Deep connections with IBM's AI and analytics

• Strong Kubernetes and container management

• Comprehensive security and compliance tools

• Great app modernization capabilities

Multi-cloud support: Manages workloads across IBM Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and on-premises. Particularly strong for Kubernetes across clouds.

Best for: Big companies updating old software, organizations that need strict oversight, and companies already using lots of IBM products.

Pricing: Enterprise licensing that depends on how many servers you manage and what features you need. Expect to pay a lot.

Good stuff:

• Complete app modernization tools

• Excellent security and compliance

• Excellent container orchestration

• Strong IBM ecosystem ties

Downsides:

• Complicated and expensive

• Your team needs to be trained on special equipment

• Difficult to leave IBM as an older user

• Too complex if not using legacy software

5. Flexera One

Flexera is a company that focuses on IT asset management and cloud cost optimization. Their solution enables the specifics of cloud spend, software licensing, and security ina  hybrid environment.

What makes it good:

• Industry-leading cloud cost management

• Full software license management

• Strong governance and compliance

• Great reporting and analytics

Multi-cloud support: Resolves cost and compliance across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and on-premises. Particularly well-suited for cost management and licensing.

Best for: Companies struggling with cloud expenditure management, enterprises with complex software licensing, and companies that need sophisticated compliance reporting.

Pricing: Subscription pricing based upon infrastructure size and capability. Generally pays for itself in costs avoided.

Good stuff:

• Strong cost control features

• Great licensing management

• Great compliance strengths

• Proven ROI through cost savings

Downsides:

• Too specialized in its capacity to manage infrastructure

• Mostly cost and compliance-centric

• Challenging to implement end-to-end

• Requires constant tweaking to deliver the best value

6. Morpheus Data

Morpheus offers cloud orchestration for enterprises and service providers with multicloud environments. Focuses on self-service provisioning and automated lifecycle management.

What makes it good:

• Strong self-service portal for end users

• Comprehensive automation and orchestration

• Great multi-tenancy support

• Strong backup and disaster recovery

Multi-cloud support: Supports over 30 different cloud and virtualization platforms, including all major public clouds and popular private cloud technologies.

Best for: Service providers, managed service providers, enterprises that need strong multi-tenancy, and organizations prioritizing self-service capabilities.

Pricing: Subscription-based pricing per managed instance or virtual machine. Scales with infrastructure size and features.

Good stuff:

• Universal platform with full provider support

• Strong self-service features

• Strong automation functionality

• Strong multi-tenancy support

Downsides:

• Too complicated for small organizations

• Needs extensive configuration and setup

• Adequate learning curve for full features

• Less recognized by brands than large vendors

7. CloudBolt

CloudBolt provides hybrid cloud management with a strong focus on governance, automation, and cost control. Includes an easy-to-deploy character with quick value for first-time multi-cloud administrators.

What makes it good:

• Quick deployment and setup

• Strong automation out of the box

• Comprehensive cost management

• Good connections with existing IT processes

Multi-cloud support: Supports major public clouds, virtualization platforms, and container orchestration. Strong hybrid cloud capabilities.

Best for: Mid-market organizations, companies wanting quick deployment, organizations needing strong cost controls with minimal setup complexity.

Pricing: Subscription-based pricing per managed server or virtual machine. Competitive for the mid-market segment.

Good stuff:

• Quick deployment and value

• Strong automation capabilities

• Good cost management

• Responsive customer support

Downsides:

• Limited advanced features compared to enterprise platforms

• Smaller ecosystem and community

• May not scale for very large environments

• Less sophisticated than top-tier enterprise solutions

8. Scalr

Scalr is focused on Terraform automation and collaboration and provides enterprise features for infrastructure-as-code processes. Bridges the gap between small-scale Terraform use and enterprise-grade infrastructure management.

What makes it good:

• Sophisticated Terraform workflow automation

• Strong teamwork features for infrastructure teams

• Comprehensive policy enforcement

• Good control and cost estimating

Multi-cloud support: Works with any Terraform provider, supporting all major clouds and hundreds of other services and platforms.

Best for: Organizations heavily using Terraform, DevOps teams needing advanced infrastructure-as-code workflows, and companies prioritizing infrastructure collaboration.

Pricing: It is a subscription-based service and is charged by each user, plus some fees for added features. Less costly than enterprise tools, but still have good current capabilities.

Good Stuff:

• Fantastic terraform upgrade and support  

• Great collaboration features  

• Good policy implementations  

• Less expensive than enterprise alternatives

Downsides:

• Need to be proficient in Terraform

• Limited non-Terraform capabilities 

• Low market share will not support organizations that do not use infrastructure-as-code

9. CloudHealth by VMware

After VMware bought CloudHealth, it provides comprehensive cloud financial management and cost control. Excels at cost visibility, governance, and performance across multi-cloud environments.

What makes it good:

• Industry-leading cloud cost analytics and performance

• Comprehensive governance and policy enforcement

• Strong reporting and dashboard capabilities

• Great cloud financial management

Multi-cloud support: Strong support for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and compatibility with VMware environments. Public cloud financial management is the key focus.

Best for: Organizations prioritizing cloud cost control, finance departments needing detailed cloud spend analysis, or companies with cloud financial governance issues.

Pricing: Percent of managed cloud spend, typically 2-4% of monthly cloud spend. Cost is typically offset by savings realized.

Good stuff:

• Strong cost management functionality

• Strong financial governance

• Granular reporting

• Strong historical cost savings

Downsides:

• Limited operational management capabilities

• Focuses purely on financial issues

• May be expensive in high-spending environments

• Less useful to organizations with low cloud spend

10. Rafay Systems

Rafay is a Kubernetes management expert for multiple clouds. They simplify challenging Kubernetes deployments and ensure that everything is secure and compliant.

What makes it good:

• Manages the entire Kubernetes lifecycle for you

• Built-in security and compliance for containers

• Great multi-cluster management

• Complete GitOps connectivity

Multi-cloud support: Manages Kubernetes clusters across all major cloud providers and on-premises environments. Strong focus on container orchestration rather than general infrastructure.

Best for: Organizations heavily using Kubernetes, companies modernizing apps with containers, and DevOps teams managing multiple Kubernetes clusters.

Pricing: Subscription-based pricing per managed cluster or node. Competitive for organizations focused on Kubernetes management.

Good stuff:

• Great Kubernetes expertise and capabilities

• Strong security and compliance

• Good multi-cluster management

• Modern cloud-native approach

Downsides:

• Only container management and Kubernetes are included.

• Not appropriate for companies that don't use containers

• Smaller ecosystem compared to general-purpose platforms

• Needs Kubernetes expertise

Conclusion

Most multi-cloud platforms sound great until you use them. The reality is different. Complex pricing that changes without warning, massive upfront costs, and fees that grow as your business grows.

Nomadesk doesn't play these games. Other companies keep adding features you don't need while locking you into their ecosystem. We concentrate on the truly important fundamentals: protecting your data, outlining the precise cost, and making everything easy enough for your team to use.

Here's what makes Nomadesk different:

• Transparent pricing: €14 per user per month, €8 for each additional TB. Never a surprise to see on your bill.

• Real security: Zero-knowledge encryption means Nomadesk cannot access your data.

• EU hosting: Genuine GDPR compliance via architecture, not contract.

• Built for business: Enterprise-class capabilities without enterprise complexity.

While competitors drain resources with complex systems that benefit vendors, Nomadesk lets you focus on growing your business with tools that actually work. Are you ready to try multi-cloud management that makes sense? Start your free Nomadesk trial today and see why over 1,000 organizations choose transparent pricing and zero-knowledge security over vendor lock-in.